Showing posts with label wedding industry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wedding industry. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Brilliant Earth, reviewed (spoiler alert: I'm mad)

You know what else gets two thumbs down? Brilliant Earth, a jewelry purveyor that specializes in conflict-free Canadian diamonds. I was excited to find exactly the wedding band I had imagined on their website, the Whisper Diamond Platinum ring. I also found almost exactly the same ring on Blue Nile, their Petite Cathedral Pave Diamond ring. They're both 1.6 mm wide, but the ring from Brilliant Earth has three more gemstones, larger carat total weight, and costs less! What could possibly go wrong?? I ordered both, as the wedding day draws nigh and I hadn't seen either in person.

Both rings are sparkly on top and platinum on the bottom. Both rings are quite thin. And yet...the Brilliant Earth ring is not even close to being the same size as the Blue Nile ring!


The Blue Nile ring is on the left; the Brilliant Earth ring is on the right.

The Blue Nile ring is closer to my hand; the Brilliant Earth ring is closer to my fingertip.

A comparison against a ruler reveals that the Brilliant Earth ring is barely 1 mm, if that. When I called customer service, a young woman put me on hold to consult her colleague, and when she returned, she informed me that the ring is, indeed, 1.6 mm as advertised. Except that it's not. 

How strange, then, to discover that the Brilliant Earth website was updated in the few hours between our phone call and Dave's email to customer service! I bet when you visit the link to the ring above, the website will tell you it's 1.3 mm! But don't worry, I've screen-capped the earlier advertisement of 1.6 mm that fooled us. I can't tell whether I'm more pleased at the prompt, more honest update of their site, or annoyed that they haven't updated the rest of the ring's statistics – I believe that the carat total weight must also be revised down, given the even tinier width of the diamonds. So much for your "ethics," Brilliant Earth! I know that all of this isn't the end of the world; we're returning the ring and getting a refund. But this episode reminds me of how much I've come to trust online shopping: I expect that the ring on a website really is the width advertised, or really does contain the weight of diamond promised. It's not Ebay or Craiglist; this is supposed to be a somewhat reputable company! Could we have imagined ten years ago that we would have such high expectations for the trustworthiness of basic online shopping?

Friday, January 11, 2013

Save-the-dates

We are woefully behind on our wedding planning. It seems we've been preoccupied with other tasks! One big priority post-job-interviews has been getting out our Save-the-Dates. I love getting magnets or beautiful postcards to put on the refrigerator. But there is no time for that! The wedding is only 4.5 months away!

So I've been trying to design myself a nice image that we can email to our friends and family as we solicit their physical addresses for the formal invitation. I had originally envisioned a modern-looking graphic image that contained our names, but not our picture. But Dave (and everyone else I talked to) liked the picture idea, and they are so right! I won't post the official Save-the-Date here, but I did want to share the background image. It's one of our favorite pictures of us. This is a self-timed photo from northern Michigan in September 2011. The original colors were brighter (and more blue), but I gave it an old-timey wash – must be the pernicious influence of Instagram!


We had just finished a long drive up north and were eager to go for a walk along the shore while the sun was setting. Dave spotted the big driftwood, and the magical moment was captured! It's hard to look relaxed in posed pictures, and we like how this one has a more casual feel. I hope it gets people excited for the wedding!


Sunday, June 17, 2012

A survey of mid-Atlantic wedding venues

Looking to get married in New Jersey, the Philadelphia area, or Wilmington? We are! And we are close to finalizing our date and venue – hopefully, by tomorrow morning! We didn't do the most exhaustive search, but we did visit over ten places. As you can imagine, we saw a lot of theme and variation – lots of places seemed to present similar ideas of "wedding glamour" (yes, that u is deliberate); other places offered "unique" "features." Here is a brief visual survey illustrating what I noticed; all are from venues we did not choose:

Domes are nice:





A whole bunch of bridal books show brides and grooms kissing in a gazebo. What's so great about gazebos? My dad speculates that they are popular because of the Sound of Music:





Get away from that Nazi, Liesl! You are way too young for this business!

Apparently, grand staircases are also de rigueur! I'm not exactly sure why...is there a related iconic image or movie for our generation of women? Cinderella? But there she's running away from the prince...




You know what else I like about this one? The indoor fountain next to the staircase! Because fountains belong indoors?


The flora of these sites is mainly of the landscaped, annual variety. But here's the fauna we encountered:


A belated picture of the shark tank!
I don't think this guy gets advertised in the wedding package, but maybe he should be!


Some venues had features that genuinely confused me. For example:

What are these painted nudes doing over these doors?

Why is the ceiling painted like the sky? We can look out the window and see the sky!


What is this I see? An indoor waterfall with silk hanging flowers? Of course it makes sense to put this indoors and in the corner of a ballroom!

Can you see the billboards right next to this venue? Advertisements for "Banger's Sport Shop" and the "South Jersey Shooting Club." That large gun makes me feel a wee bit nervous...
I'll stop here. Thanks for coming along this little journey with me!

Monday, June 11, 2012

Structure

What aspects of a wedding are most memorable to you? When I think back on the many weddings I've been fortunate to attend in recent years, I often don't remember the things that I suspect brides and grooms spend a lot of time planning. I have a hard time remembering what favors were left on the table; what the color scheme was; what kind of bows were on the pews at the church; what kind of centerpieces were on each table, etc. Instead, I remember how I experienced the day. I remember sitting in a sweltering church without air conditioning on an August Saturday; the time when dinner was served an hour late and I was starving; the outdoor ceremony in September when we all unexpectedly froze; the deafening band, or the obnoxious D.J.; the place with NO PARKING.

I've recently been trying to prioritize these "structural issues" more. There are a lot of places in New Jersey that I think are tacky and make no sense: why is there a fountain in the middle of the floor? What is this indoor waterfall with silk plants doing in the wall of the ballroom? Why is this carpet so ugly? Who decided it was necessary to paint blue sky and clouds on every ceiling? But I've been realizing that maybe the aesthetics aren't as important as other aspects of a venue: is it the appropriate size? Will there be enough food? Will there be good climate control? Is the layout intuitive? Are there enough bathrooms? I saw a beautiful country club that was just my style, but all the sales staff were really alarmed at how many people we are planning to invite. Is it worth holding my wedding at that country club, if everyone feels crowded and squished? And they find it a difficult task to get up to use the bathroom?

D. and I went venue-shopping this past weekend, in addition to the other places I've already visited with my mom. We saw a whole bunch of places, and even reserved a date at two of them! So now we are holding a date at four different venues. I wonder if you're not supposed to do that! Anyway, we are trying to have the wedding in the second half of May or the first half of June. It's starting to come together!

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Guerrilla wedding?

I've started looking at wedding venues for the reception with my mom; we're checking out places in South Jersey, Philadelphia, and Wilmington. Even though we've already eliminated North Jersey as too expensive (hello, proximity to New York City!), all of these places on the East Coast are way-pricey. It's amazing how quickly the events salespeople can make me forget just how much money we're going to be dropping in a single evening. It's crazy! I don't think I have the courage, though, to plan a tiny wedding (family alone is over 100 people) or to elope or to plan a destination wedding so no one will come.

Now here's a fascinating alternative: the guerrilla wedding! (Cue the Dad joke: "Hey, don't say that about the bride! It's not nice!") I read about it recently in the WSJ. I'm sure you can save money this way (provided you don't also think it's a great idea to fly out your favorite band to the bar you rented out), but would this really be less stressful?? I'm pretty sure the last thing I want to worry about on my wedding day is an encounter with law enforcement.

Here's the full article:

Wedding Crashers: Saying 'I Do' in Public

Need an alternative to the $25,000 to-do? Introducing the stealth approach, where couples quietly trade "I dos" in a host of public forums.


It's not every day that Morag Stewart and Kevin Eggan plan a covert operation. But on a recent morning in Breckenridge, Colo., the pair put together a series of mysterious directions -- take the lift to the top of the mountain, look for the guy in the red jacket -- that ultimately led 80 of their friends and family to a clearing in the glades. It was a logistical nightmare, but the payoff was big: It was their wedding.

Have you been to a wedding in the woods lately? Or watched a couple tie the knot in the middle of a shopping mall? A small but growing group of intrepid couples are ditching the dulce de leche cake filling and glitzy chandeliers for something a bit more, well, impromptu. They're paying an officiant $300 to marry them in front of a prized painting at an art museum or asking a photographer to capture them whispering "I do" in a botanical garden before the security guards come running. The trend, once limited to a few postrecession penny-pinchers, is now flowering into its own full-fledged wedding-industry niche. Mary Beaty, an officiant in New York, says inquiries for these so-called elopements or guerrilla-style weddings have doubled in the past few years, while Jerry Schwehm, a minister in New Orleans, is now performing three times as many as he did five years ago. "Many of my clients run away from the traditional, scary wedding planning," says Kim Coccagnia, a wedding photographer in Beacon, N.Y. "They want small and intimate."

Given the lackluster economy, you can't blame couples for skipping the usual to-do in favor of a simpler -- and ideally cheaper -- affair. Indeed, the average cost of a wedding totaled $25,600 last year, down 11 percent from the prerecession high. And with more couples footing the bill themselves, there's less pressure to "do what family expects," says Beaty. Then there's the demographic trend: The average marriage age is now 28 -- up from 25 in 1990. Three-quarters of these couples live together first, which many say dials down the importance of emulating Mom and Dad's traditional wedding. That's particularly true for some longtime same-sex couples in states that now sanction civil unions. "We didn't want to make a huge deal out of it, because we've been together for almost 10 years," says Tasha Moss, who recently married her partner at a nature center in Chicago.

But just because a couple skips the chapel doesn't mean the planning process gets any easier. It can be tough to find pros, like photographers and clergy, who are willing to bend the rules, and pulling off a ceremony in a public place without drawing the wrong kind of attention (read: hostile security guards) is no easy feat. Couples who start down the guerrilla path to save may also find that costs add up surprisingly quickly: Despite paying zilch for their ceremony spot, Stewart and Eggan ended up spending close to $30,000 on their Colorado wedding. How? By flying in their favorite Boston band to play at a local bar they rented out. Says Stewart: "It was better than paying $80 a plate at some reception hall."

In some ways, stealth weddings are a throwback to the early 20th century. Back then, couples often said vows at home and then simply went to dinner. It wasn't until the 1950s that the bridal industry emerged and started wooing brides with fantasies of white weddings, says Stephanie Coontz, author of Marriage, a History. Of course, now couples don't blink when the $54 billion industry tells them to spend a year planning an event that lasts six hours -- and costs as much as a new car.
When graphic designers Carrie and Martin Gee got engaged, they decided to plan a formal affair in the gardens of the Boston Public Library. But as the questions about centerpieces and wedding favors started to stream in, they began to reconsider. "We looked at each other and asked, 'Is this really worth the stress?'" says Carrie. The Gees forfeited most of their library deposit and, several months later, walked into the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. (Coats hid Carrie's dress and Martin's tux.) With five family members, they stood in front of Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night and said their vows. "People realized what was going on and started applauding," Carrie says.

Of course, trading vows in front of a Dutch master isn't usually quite as simple as all that. The best guerrilla weddings, pros say, require plenty of coordination. Couples typically start by scouting a potential locale to see if it could feasibly host a ceremony. Often, they find that if they pick a slow time like, say, 2 p.m. on a Friday, there's less chance of getting caught. Then they must track down an officiant who'll agree to an unsanctioned event. As the date gets closer, couples choose whom to invite (less than a dozen people tends to work best), what instructions to give guests (arrive in groups of two to avoid suspicion) and what to say, should staffers ask questions. In Colorado, for example, Stewart and Eggan set up a group rate on chairlift tickets by claiming they were having a family reunion. "They kept telling guests, 'Don't ask any staff where the wedding is,'" says Jennifer Ballard, the couple's photographer.

There's a good reason for caution: Some venues don't allow impromptu ceremonies. The Museum of Modern Art, for example, does not permit weddings and says couples will be asked to leave if they're discovered. Disney World also bans them -- unless it's an official "Disney Wedding," which can cost more than $65,000 for a customized affair (Cinderella's crystal coach: optional). And it's not just venues that object to the idea; more-traditional folks may find that reciting vows in front of a large group carries more weight than a private ceremony, says Rachel Sussman, a marriage therapist and the author of The Breakup Bible.

Even the best-planned event can hit a snag. Ericka Tucker and Drew Tompkins set up a webcam at their ceremony at Los Angeles's Union Station, so family could watch via the Web. But when security guards spotted the couple's laptop, they cut the ceremony short. (A Union Station spokesperson says the courtyard where the ceremony took place is available for weddings but costs $6,000 to rent.)

Couples also run into problems with family over the ultrasmall guest list these affairs typically require. "It didn't matter that my mom's cousin happens to live in Chicago," says Moss, the Windy City eloper. "We didn't invite her." To soften the blow, Moss and her partner, Mel Morelli, arranged postwedding family dinner parties in several cities. Other couples have used a similar strategy and report that it can help soothe hurt feelings -- as well as jack up the bill.

Ultimately, wedding pros say, a successful guerrilla wedding often comes down to one thing: realistic expectations. Beaty, the officiant, says she recently found herself placating a bride who got mad when she heard she couldn't haul a portable arbor into Brooklyn Bridge Park. Says Beaty: "I don't think she understood the idea of being quiet and discreet."


[sm0612wedding1]





Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Truth from the wedding industry

You can expect that I'll have plenty of rants about lies that the wedding industry will be feeding me over the next few months. Most perfect day of your life, blah blah, you're so unique and special, blah blah. But here's a quote I noticed in a wedding photography book:

"A bride will have the tiniest waist of her entire lifetime."

True? If Spanx's sudden appeal to me is any indication, #weddingindustrytruth!

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Strapless can be scary

It looks like my first real post is going to be about wedding dresses. <sigh> How is it that wedding dresses come in truly infinite variety, yet they all end up looking the same? All of my married friends were lovely brides, and I cared very much about their weddings. Most of their wedding dresses were completely unmemorable. Ummm...white? strapless? some embellishments?

Variation in neckline and silhouette will not remedy this problem entirely, but I do think this Slate article points the way forward. And many thanks are due to Kate Middleton's lovely dress, which will shape a generation's idea of a glamorous wedding. I'm unlikely to choose a similar style, but it's hard to argue with more options for all!

(Getty images)